I'll start by saying that I
have the AMI Montessori training for birth to age 6, and no
experience with other education methods except for some volunteer
work in traditional preschools, so if you see anything incorrect
about another method please correct me promptly. I have done some
reading but not everything on the internet is accurate – and some
of the things I've read about Montessori make me cringe. With that said...
I think something that makes
Montessori unique is that it is reality based. Young children
(under six – what we call the first plane of development) are still
trying to figure out what the world is like. If we offer them
fantasy, fun as it is, that can really confuse them because they
don't have enough knowledge about the world to understand the
difference between reality and fantasy. So, in a Montessori
environment, we offer only reality based materials for those first
six years. This is one of the major differences between Montessori
and Waldorf, because my understanding is that Waldorf education
focuses on fantasy play as a major learning tool.
Something else that I think
is unique about Montessori is that the materials were developed
scientifically. What I mean by that is that Montessori didn't
base her work on expectations of what the children would be
interested in or capable of. She just offered a room full of
materials, including toys, practical activities such as for cleaning,
educational materials, and so on. Then she observed the children, and
kept only the things which interested them. She added materials based
on what she observed, to delve deeper into ideas that the children
found interesting and to help the children develop skills that were
lacking for the work they wanted to do. For example, she noted that
some children were having trouble sewing, so she offered a bead
stringing work as a preliminary activity to practice the motions with
less difficulty. By the time the children grew bored with bead
stringing, their hands were ready for the more delicate work of
sewing.
The progression of materials
also helps children to categorize things and understand how concepts
fit together. As young as the toddler community you will see children
begin to abstract the essential characteristics of things, such as,
“all butterflies have wings, but not all butterflies are blue.”
Montessori doesn't assume
that something is too difficult for a child simply based on age.
When Dr Montessori was developing those materials, she regularly
found that the children she offered them to were not interested, but
children a few years younger were enamored. A big example of this is
reading. When I see people saying that 5 is too young to focus on
reading, I cringe a little – because if children have the
opportunity to learn the sounds and shapes of the letters when they
are three, they spontaneously write around 4 (with chalk or moveable
letters, not necessarily pencils) and read around 4.5. The Montessori
method agrees with the idea that we shouldn't be pushing
reading, but emphatically disagrees that 5 is too young.
Montessori education includes
work appropriate to the child's sensitive periods. In
neuroscience these are called “windows of opportunity”, and what
it means is that the child's brain is focused more intently on
specific acquisitions at specific times. For example, when a child is
in the sensitive period for developing the use of his senses (seeing,
hearing, tasting, smelling, and touching), there are many materials
for practicing them such as the smelling jars, tasting bottles,
bells, etc. I don't know of any other educational method that
includes all of those sensory experiences daily, especially
categorized in so logical a way.
Montessori classrooms have
mixed age groups. This allows younger children to observe
older children's work and behavior, and simultaneously allows older
children to experience leadership positions and be genuinely helpful.
It also decreases competition for the same materials and lets younger
children look forward to the materials they will be ready to work
with later. I know this is rare in traditional schools, but I have no
idea about other paradigms.
I also think the
Montessori take on repetition is a little different. Tradition
education is a huge proponent of repetition, but they do it the form
of worksheets or homework, i.e., forced repetition. Montessori
advocates for repetition, but only when the child is choosing it
voluntarily. When a child chooses to repeat something it is because
he is learning from it, and we want him to develop that concentration
so he can figure out whatever it is he is trying to figure out.
This directly relates to
sharing and taking turns, by the way – in a Montessori environment
a child works with a material as long as he wants and returns it to
the shelf when he is finished, ready for the next person. He doesn't
have to share it because we don't want to interrupt his work. At the
beginning many children need help with waiting for something to be
available, which has the benefit of developing patience and
generosity. This
is because when they share,
it is a volunteered
sharing that is internally motivated. There is only one of
each material in the environment, so sometimes a child gets a lot of
practice being patient.
What Montessori has in common
with some other methods is the practice of following the child's
interests. I know that RIE focuses on this as well, and that both
methods emphasize observation of the child, but I think Montessori
takes the lead here because it offers opportunities that RIE
practitioners might assume children aren't ready for or won't be
interested in. For example, I've seen RIE websites advocate for later
toilet learning, whereas Montessori provides a lot of precursors and
makes toilets available at a young age, so that the child can mimic
his elders as soon as he becomes ready without having to wait for
subtle external signals (which may not come for a long time if the
child hasn't had those precursors such as watching others use a
toilet and feeling wetness in cloth diapers and underwear). So we
offer activities by giving a lesson, and if the child isn't
interested that's fine. He may be interested later and we will give
the lesson again if necessary.
Montessori also shares a deep
respect for the child and his inner process with other methods.
The primary classroom for ages 3-6 is called the “casa de bambini”,
which means the “children's house”. Montessori teachers, or
“guides” as we usually call ourselves, are taught as part of our
training that the materials belong to the children and not us (no
matter who pays for them)... so if a beautiful material gets broken
we will share in the child's sadness and repair or replace it, but we
won't be angry because it was for the children, and it provided a
learning experience (which is why we intentionally use materials that
are breakable and require taking care). The children learn to care
for their “home” and do so willingly because it is theirs and
they take pride in it. They love it because it is full of beautiful
things prepared just for them, and they respect it because their
efforts maintain it.
There are a ton of other
things that I could say about Montessori, and you can probably tell
that I'm quite passionate about it, but this post is getting pretty
long so I'll cap it here and answer any questions either in the
comment section or a new post.
Next up is what to look for
in a Montessori school!
Love this insider's view on the Montessori approach. Thank you so much for writing and sharing it!
ReplyDeleteI also love that you started straight with the main differentiation between Waldorf and Montessori. I always say that even though they are both on the same end of the 'alternative education spectrum', they are kind of opposite from each other, in a way - and you have illustrated that 'way' really well, here. Montessori is practical, grounded in the real world, with real tools and real tasks. It is sensorial and Earthy, somehow.
Waldorf is of the mind and imagination, of the soul and creativity. (I think these are terms they would agree with).
So, now we are down to how we think the child is developing, what is most important to them and what they *need* the most at this stage. Paging the psychologists... if only they could agree.
To me it seems evident that they are both true - kids are very much into imagination and love tall stories (even when they are clear that they are not 'real')... and they are enchanted with the simple, everyday tasks they see all around us - and yearn to master them. But I do think it is a good point you make about kids not having sufficient understanding about the world to tell fantasy from reality. Then again, don't all cultures tell fables, fairy tales and folk stories to their young? It is certainly not without historical precedence, right?
I kind of want a side-by-side comparrison of the results, if that makes sense. I want to see 100 or 1000 kids from each schooling system and see what patterns we find. How do they turn out different? what are the strengths and weakenesses of each system - or is it truly just about finding what works best for individual children?
Thanks for the great food for thought,
Gauri
LovingEarthMama
A side by side comparison of the results would be awesome - but before we could do side by side with Montessori and Waldorf, or Montessori and anything, we'd have to do side by side with different Montessori types. I stand by AMI, which is the organization Dr. Montessori helped found and which (to the best of my knowledge) has the highest standards... but pretty much any comparison done by non-Montessori people is unlikely to separate between AMI and other types of Montessori. I think that would water down the benefits of Montessori in any comparison, and I'd like it to the best of it that gets compared, if that makes sense. I definitely agree that we need more research!
ReplyDelete